
GPS data has become ubiquitous with performance management and it provides a mountain of data on how far someone ran, how fast they did it, how many times they started and stopped along with a bunch of other numbers. In the APM platform, we've simplified it down to four key metrics (distance, HMLD, high intensity and sprints) that we're using to help athletes and organizations understand capacity, better manage load and provide clarity on actionable steps.
Our GPS setup is intended to be seamless and easy to configure. Our current integration is with PlayerData (https://playerdata.com/) and setup takes about 1 minute once all the configuration values are received from PlayerData. You can visit support to get additional details on setup (https://athleteperformancemgmt.com/support-gps). Once configuration is setup, ingesting today's data is one-click. Additional configuration allows the user to select a time window to pull in additional data.
In addition, an organization can upload data manually to address situations where GPS data is not available (tracker went dead, player forgot to wear tracker) or where they want to augment data from other organizations (national team data sharing, external private training). A simple template is able to be downloaded which provides all the necessary keys so that manually added data can be properly mapped to players.
Distance is a foundational metric, but it is the least critical as much of it depends upon internal processes on when you hand out trackers, the setup of sessions, etc. We monitor it because it is a large number, so minor things don't impact it too much when it's consistent within your program. Outliers are easy to spot and should trigger a conversation.
HMLD stands for high metabolic load distance. We consider this the most important metric and one where target development and management should be focused. It incorporates speed, distance, accelerations, decelerations and is ultimately a proxy for work.
High intensity distance is intended to represent a good running speed. We recommend configuring your GPS tool to identify 70% of max speed as the threshold for high intensity running.
Sprint distance is intended to represent high taxing running speeds. We recommend configuring your GPS tool to identify 85% of max speed as the threshold for high intensity running.
We focus on these four metrics as distance provides a total volume and HMLD provides the base line athlete capacity. High intensity and sprinting provide context for HMLD so we can get a better sense of where the players' work rate is coming from (e.g., is it coming from a significant number of high speed runs or is it coming from accelerations and decelerations but not getting to top end speed). Ultimately you require distance to get to 70% of max and even more distance to get to 85% of max, so this comparison gives us insight to how the player is training and playing.
All of this is important and why we are building a target building model which will allow organizations to create player-level targets based on their capacity, how they play and train and how they want to grow/maintain capacity at various parts of the season.

Whether a player plays 20 minutes or 80 minutes in a match, the system provides ability to automatically scale partial matches to full match numbers based on the input of your performance coach. In addition, the system provides baseline numbers to minimize over-estimating a full match load.

System provides 6 baseline models to choose from, all based on individual player data to dynamically build targets on a weekly basis. Player Max and Player Average use the totals on a weekly basis as the base metric. Match Max and Match Average use a player's actual match data as the base metric. And Scaled Match Max and Scaled Match Average use the normalized Match data (using the scaling factors) for each player.
The multiplier then allow a performance coach to determine how they want the math to work to calculate the targets based on the base metric and each of the key measures. Multipliers can be customized at the player level to allow additional personalization based on the status of the player.
The GPS report provides visibility to the key metrics plus max velocity and % of max velocity on a daily basis.
The average is calculated from the data in the report so you can see how each player compares to the session average for each of the metrics.
All of the data in the report can be sorted including by player (alphabetically) and each of the metrics (ascending/descending) to provide quick access to information.
Configuration features allow the user to look at daily or weekly data as well as filter the data by position.
Report can not only display the actual values of the data, but their comparison to a player's maximum match data and maximum scaled match data as well as % of target and amount of distance remaining in the week.
When looking at percent of target or remaining, the user has the ability to remove 1 or 2 matches of data (depending upon the number of games during the week) to have better visibility to training targets keeping players fresh for match day.
All reports have been updated with exporting functionality a user can take the structured data and do more advanced analysis to support their workflow.
The GPS match report provides visibility to data that only represents stats from when the player is in the match. This does require the organization to provide match information in the data, whether leveraging PlayerData matches or specifically tagging PlayerData training sessions in a specific way.
The average is calculated from the data in the report so you can see how each player compares to the session average for each of the metrics.
All of the data in the report can be sorted including by player (alphabetically) and each of the metrics (ascending/descending) to provide quick access to information.
Report can not only display the actual values of the data, but the scaled versions of those numbers as well as the player's maximum and scaled maximum for all of their games.
Manage your players' positions and utilize the filters to compare with a position or across position groups to further refine your understanding of match loads.
All reports have been updated with exporting functionality a user can take the structured data and do more advanced analysis to support their workflow.